|
| |
|
Articles
Executive Function
 |
Adaptive skills and executive function in autism spectrum disorders.
- There is active debate regarding the nature of executive dysfunction
in autism. Additionally, investigations have yet to show a relationship
between deficits in executive function and the everyday behavioral
difficulties that may originate from them. The present study examined the
relationship between executive abilities and adaptive behavior in 35
children with Autism Spectrum Disorders, using two parent reports of
everyday functioning, the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) and the
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Results found
several relationships: The Initiate and Working Memory domains were
negatively correlated with most domains of adaptive behavior. Also, the
Communication and Socialization domains of the VABS were negatively
correlated with several areas of executive functioning, suggesting that
impairments in executive abilities are strongly associated with the
deficits in communication, play and social relationships found in children
with autism by Gilotty L, Kenworthy L, Sirian L, Black DO, Wagner AE. /
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Psychology, Children's National
Medical Center, Washington, DC 20009, USA. lgilotty@cnmc.org
|
 |
“Bridging
the Gap - Opioid Peptides and Executive Function” “The cobbler
should stick to his last”. Old English Proverb by Paul Shattock & Paul
Whiteley, University of Sunderland, UK -
One of the main
objectives of conferences is that people with differing background and
understanding can come together and not only promote their own studies and
points of view but also learn from the experience of others. This is
particularly important in the study of autism where so many disciplines
are involved. The Courchesnes (1997) discussed this issue with regard to
the differing needs of clinicians and practitioners, and scientific
researchers and have pointed out the commonalities and dichotomies
inherent in their approaches. There is an additional difficulty within the
field of autism in that a number of apparently totally different and, at
first sight, incompatible sets of understanding and experience are
required. Although the syllabi for modern degrees in psychology require a
basic appreciation of neurology, graduates cannot be expected to be
comfortable with more complex biological and neurological processes. Even
worse, those with a physiological or pharmacological training are often
dismissive of concepts, which involve measuring elements, which cannot be
seen, weighed or quantified by physical methods. One of the most
intractable divides, within the field of autism at least, is that which
separates brain biochemistry and the psychological theories, which
underlie the symptoms by which autism is still defined. This paper
represents an attempt to explore some aspect of that gap. Given that no
one really understands the neurochemical workings involved in the central
nervous system especially when they may well be abnormal, as in the case
of autism, the task is a difficult one. The speculations contained in the
following pages, are offered and can be accepted as no more than that.
|
 |
Executive
Dysfunction -
The term “executive functioning” refers to
mental processes involved in goal-directed activity. The work on this has
been primarily done in Neuropsychology but the implications for educators
are important. Executive functioning has been rather under-discussed in
the school context as yet (stay tuned for my dissertation
J)
where these issues have been attributed to failures in discipline rather
than brain function by Kristine S. Knight
|
 |
Executive dysfunction in autism
- ‘Executive function’ is an umbrella term for functions
such as planning, working memory, impulse control, inhibition and mental
flexibility, as well as for the initiation and monitoring of action. The
primacy of executive dysfunction in autism is a topic of much debate, as
are recent attempts to examine subtypes of
executive function within autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders
that are considered to implicate frontal lobe function. This article will
review cognitive behavioural studies of planning, mental flexibility and
inhibition in autism. It is concluded that more detailed research is
needed to fractionate the executive system in autism by assessing a wide
range of executive functions as well as their neuroanatomical correlates
in the same individuals across the lifespan by Elisabeth L. Hill
Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, University of London,
Whitehead Building, New Cross, London, SE14 6NW, UK
|
 |
Executive Functioning
- Executive
Functioning is the brain's ability to absorb information, interpret this
information, and make decisions based upon this information. For example,
most people have a routine when they get up in the morning. Some mornings
you might look out the window and see something is dripping from the sky.
This dripping is interpreted as "rain" which implies a set of rules (i.e.,
needing to wear different clothes, the soccer game will be canceled which
means you need to make other arrangements for an after school activity,
rolling down the windows while you drive is not wise, you don't need to
water the grass today, etc.), by Alex Michaels
|
 |
Executive Functions in Young Children with Autism
by
Elizabeth M. Griffith,
Bruce F. Pennington, Elizabeth A.Wehner, and Sally J. Rogers
|
 |
Executive
functioning and memory strategy use in children with autism: The influence
of task constraints on spontaneous rehearsal - An executive
functioning deficit in autism should be reflected in a low
level of active strategy use on memory tasks. This study was a
direct examination of memory strategy use in two
problem-solving situations by children with autism. Two groups
with autism were tested, one high-functioning group and one
with moderate cognitive impairments. All participants took part
in two memory experiments to examine the effect of changing the
nature of the learning situation on strategy use: one experiment
used a serial recall task, and the other a recall readiness
task. In contrast to previous studies, significant spontaneous
strategy use was found on both memory tasks, particularly among
the high-functioning group. Similarly, changing task structure
was found to have an important impact on increasing strategy
use, particularly for the moderate-functioning group. However,
the overall rate of strategy use for the children with autism
was still lower than would be expected for non-handicapped groups.
The results support an executive functioning deficit interpretation,
but a deficit that is less extensive among high-functioning
individuals. Practical implications of the study in terms of
cognitive training are also discussed by James M. Bebko, York
University, Canada and Christina Ricciuti, York University, Canada
|
 |
Memory in Autism: Review and Synthesis - Much research about memory in
autism concerns the hypothesis that autism is similar to adult-onset
amnesia. Initial support for the hypothesis came from post-mortem studies
of
individuals with autism showing abnormalities in the hippocampus and
related brain structures, as well as behavioral studies finding contrasts
between intact cued recall and impaired free recall and recognition in
autism. The hypothesis was later brought into question by the finding of
intact performance in individuals with autism on explicit memory tasks
typically impaired in adult-onset amnesia. The present paper proposes a
possible
reconciliation of these contradictory findings, suggesting that there is
selective damage to the limbic-prefrontal episodic memory system, sparing
the limbic-only perceptual representation system, and the semantic memory
system. This view is consistent with other evidence for early selective
damage to other systems involving cooperation between the limbic system
and the medial prefrontal cortex in autism. by Dorrit Ben Shalom /
(Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben
Gurion University of the Negev) 
|
 |
Relations
between Executive Function, Language Acquisition, and Autism -
Executive function, specifically inhibitory control has been indicated as
a major prerequisite to language learning in children. Specifically,
inhibitory control is thought to help infants cope with discrepant
labeling (Baldwin & Moses, 2001; Brand, 2003). It is suggested that
individuals with autism have difficulty with executive functioning
(Mitchell, 1997; Ozonoff, Pennington, & Rogers, 1991; Klin, Volkmar, &
Sparrow, 2000; Baron-Cohen, Tager-Flusberg, & Cohen, 2000). It was
proposed by Ozonoff et al. (1991), that people with autism may insist on
sameness and repetitive behavior, and may have problems keeping attention
because they have deficits in executive control. Studies by Ozonoff et al.
(1991) suggest that children with autism tended to act impulsively and
were unable to move their attention from one task to another. Other
studies have indicated that individuals with autism have problems with
classical executive function tasks, such as the Wisconsin Card Sort and
the Tower of Hanoi (Hughes & Russell, 1993). As was suggested earlier,
executive functioning relates to language acquisition. This evidence
potentially relates to the language acquisition of autistic individuals in
that people with autism seems to have deficits in executive function and
therefore have problems with learning language. There is not much evidence
that supports this hypothesis, however. Further research is required to
confirm the relationship between executive function, language acquisition,
and autism.
|
 |
SELF-REGULATION: EXECUTIVE FUNCTION ROUTINES IN CHILDREN AND
ADOLESCENTS WITH AUTISM - Mark Ylvisaker, Ph.D., College of Saint Rose
Albany, New York, USA
ylvisakm@mail.strose.edu 
|
 |
Theory of mind in autism: its relationship to executive function and
central coherence. This paper appeared in D. Cohen & F. Volkmar
(eds) Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders. 2nd
Edition, John Wiley and Sons. 1997 - Does the autistic child have a
"theory of mind"? This was the question - and the title of the paper -
that opened this area (Baron-Cohen, Leslie, 4 and Frith, 1985). The
question was asked because of the interest that was developing concerning
the normal child's understanding of mental states. Indeed, two years
before this was asked of
children with autism, the related question had been asked of normal 4 year
olds. Wimmer and Perner (1983) had devised an elegant paradigm to make
this issue tractable, in which the child was presented with a short story,
with the simplest of plots. The story essentially involved one character
not being present when an object was moved, and therefore not knowing that
the object was in a new location. The subject being tested is asked where
the character thinks the object is. Wimmer and Perner called this
the False Belief test, since the focus was on the subject's ability
to infer a story character's mistaken belief about a situation. These
authors found that normal 4 year olds could correctly infer that the
character would think the object was where the character had last left it,
rather than where it actually was. This was impressive evidence for the
normal child's ability to distinguish between their own knowledge (about
reality) and someone else's false belief (about reality).

|
 
Archived Articles
Go Top
|
|